Heads up: Byebug has problems with zeitwerk

Updated . Posted . Visible to the public.

I encountered a unlucky behavior of byebug 11.1.3 (the most recent version at time of writing) when using it with Rails 6 and it's new autoloading component, zeitwerk. There already is a issue Show archive.org snapshot for that, so I hope it will be fixed with a future release.

The following test succeeds:

  context 'factories' do
    let(:test_case) { FactoryBot.create(:test_case) }
    it 'are valid' do
      expect(test_case).to be_valid

But when I did the same in byebug the following happened:

(byebug) FactoryBot.create(:test_case)
*** NameError Exception: uninitialized constant #<Class:0x000055580a8e7918>::TargetLimitation
Did you mean?  TargetsTestScenario

It seems like Byebug does not work well with zeitwerk. There is already a patch in Ruby 3.1 Show archive.org snapshot , that would allow Byebug to solve the issue. But at the time of writing only ruby/debug Show archive.org snapshot implemented the fix and uses TracePoint.allow_reentry. The issue for Byebug Show archive.org snapshot is still open.


Good: Use a different debugger

Jard Show archive.org snapshot seems also to have problems with zeitwerk, since the create statement just didn't return.
Pry Show archive.org snapshot (binding.pry) worked without problems for me. Note: In case you are using pry-byebug, you need to replace it with pry. Otherwise binding.pry is still broken.

Neutral: Use eager loading in tests

Eager loading means all classes are loaded before the code starts executing. Be aware that this could have an impact on the performance of tests.


config.eager_load = true

Bad: Switch back to use the classic autoloading


config.autoloader = :classic

Your choice of debugger should not force you to use old/different settings in the whole application. You can do that temporarily though.

Even more bad: explicitly require the not found class

This will leave you with a mess of requires that has to be maintained and be cleaned up in the future. You can do that temporarily though.

Also quite bad: Explicitly mention the class before your debugger statement

# ... (code)
# ... (more code)

This will leave you with a mess of calls to the class that has to be maintained and be cleaned up in the future. You can do that temporarily though.

Last edit
Source code in this card is licensed under the MIT License.
Posted to makandra dev (2021-05-12 07:31)