Posted over 4 years ago. Visible to the public. Repeats. Linked content.

Verifying doubles in RSpec 3

RSpec 3 has verifying doubles. This breed of mock objects check that any methods being stubbed are present on an instance of a given class. They also check methods aren't called with the wrong number of arguments.

This dual approach allows you to move very quickly and test components in isolation, while
giving you confidence that your doubles are not a complete fiction.

You should always prefer using a verifying double to using an old-school mock or double instance.

Using verifying doubles

Like this:

class User def login ... end end user = instance_double(User) expect(user).to receive(:login).and_return('u123') # works expect(user).to receive(:screen_name).and_return('u123') # raises "User does not implement: screen_name"

I strongly recommend to instantiate the instance_double using the class objects (User) instead of the class name string ("User") as you see in the examples. If you use a non-existing class name, verifying doubles fail silently.

There is also an option verify_doubled_constant_names which you can set in your spec_helper.rb, but this one requires you to eager-load your entire model tree before running specs.

Verifying partial doubles

See Configure RSpec to raise an error when stubbing a non-existing method.

Verifying doubles in RSpec 2

For older RSpecs there is rspec-fire.

Does your version of Ruby on Rails still receive security updates?
Rails LTS provides security patches for old versions of Ruby on Rails (3.2 and 2.3).

Owner of this card:

Henning Koch
Last edit:
about 3 years ago
by Henning Koch
About this deck:
We are makandra and do test-driven, agile Ruby on Rails software development.
License for source code
Posted by Henning Koch to makandra dev
This website uses cookies to improve usability and analyze traffic.
Accept or learn more