Posted almost 8 years ago. Visible to the public. Repeats.

PSA: Umlauts are not always what they seem to be

When you have a string containing umlauts which don't behave as expected (are not matched with a regexp, can't be found with an SQL query, do not print correctly on LaTeX documents, etc), you may be encountering umlauts which are not actually umlaut characters.

They look, depending on the font, like their "real" umlaut counterpart:

ä ↔ ä
ö ↔ ö
ü ↔ ü

However, they are not the same:

Copy
>> 'ä' == 'ä'
=> false
>> 'ä'.size
=> 1
>> 'ä'.size
=> 2

Looking at how those strings are constructed reveals what is going on:

Copy
>> 'ä'.unpack('U*')
=> [228]
>> 'ä'.unpack('U*')
=> [97, 776]

As you can see, the 2nd representation is actually a combination of "a" (character code 97) and a negative-space unicode character which puts the dots on top of it Archive .

This is terrible.

Ruby 2.2 is your friend

Ruby 2.2 brings String#unicode_normalize Archive and its bang and query brothers.

Copy
2.2.0 :001 > 'ä' == 'ä'
 => false 
2.2.0 :002 > 'ä' == 'ä'.unicode_normalize
 => true

Also see

The Big List of Naughty Strings Archive is an evolving list of strings which have a high probability of causing issues when used as user-input data.

Protect your Rails app from security breaches

Does your version of Ruby on Rails still receive security updates?
Rails LTS provides security patches for unsupported versions of Ruby on Rails (2.3, 3.2, 4.2 and 5.2).

Learn more

PSA: Umlauts are not always what they seem to be

Ruby 2.2 is your friend

Also see

Owner of this card: